The Most Valuable Celebrity Faces

Forbes - October 9, 2008 5:30 PM PDT
Story photo: The Most Valuable Celebrity FacesAngelina Jolie/WireImage.comForbes
If America is falling into the recession economists fear it is, Angelina Jolie may prove more important than ever.

To the country's celebrity magazine editors, that is. Shrinking wallets could mean shrinking readership, and nobody moves magazines like Jolie, according to Forbes.com's second annual analysis of the top-selling celebrity faces.

In Pictures: Top-Earning Cover Stars

"The idea of spending $3.99 on a magazine when you don't know what your economic future is is very, very difficult," says Star magazine Editor-in-Chief Candace Trunzo. "It makes it that much more important for us to present a cover that is so appealing that they can't help but buy it."

For the newsstand-dependent celebrity weeklies, compelling covers are absolutely crucial, making editors' choices of cover stars more important than ever. How these magazines fare in the face of economic hardship remains to be seen, since none of them, with the exception of People, were around in their current forms during the last big downturn in the early 1990s.

So expect to see a lot more of Jolie. We analyzed the newsstand sales for the six biggest celebrity weeklies -- People, Star, US Weekly, In Touch Weekly, Life & Style and OK! -- over a year-long period ending June 30, eliminating non-celebrity and "collage" covers as well as special issues with exceptionally large rate bases.

More galleries on Forbes.com
We then counted how many more -- or fewer -- issues the celebrity's cover sold as compared to the magazine's average newsstand sales per issue. We also factored in the number of full covers a celebrity individually graced as well as his or her appeal, a measure provided by Los Angeles-based market research firm E-Poll Market Research. Stars were left off the list in rare cases when "likability" data wasn't available.

Jolie earned the top spot, thanks to strong performances in all three categories. Whether it's her humanitarian efforts or her ever-expanding brood, the globe-trotting A-lister has little trouble garnering interest at the checkout line.

Jennifer Aniston also proved highly appealing, this time landing second on our list (she was No. 1 last year). Thanks to her ever-tumultuous love life, the former "Friends" star appeared on eight covers all by herself, and many of them flew off shelves.

Rounding out the top three is Heath Ledger, whose life was cut tragically short earlier this year. In his case, it was his mysterious and all-too-early death that made him front-cover news -- something he hadn't been prior to his passing. Traditionally, male covers sell far fewer copies than female ones with the typically female reader base (both Brad Pitt and Matthew McConaughey failed to make the top 10, though another tragic cover subject, Owen Wilson, did). But the idea of a talent like Ledger dying so young left readers grasping for clues -- and buying magazines in search of them.

Sound frivolous? It may seem so, but it's also big business, with the six weeklies accounting for hundreds of millions of dollars in annual revenue for the magazine industry. Taken together, newsstand sales account for 53% of the 9.4 million copies sold weekly by the sextet. Of them, only People counts on subscriptions for more than half its weekly sales. For two of the titles -- Life & Style Weekly and In Touch -- newsstand accounts for more than 95% of sales, making them particularly vulnerable to bad cover choices.

"You have basically five seconds, maybe less, to grab a reader at the newsstand," says In Touch Editor Michelle Lee. "So they either have to love that star or they have to be fascinated by their story that week."

If it were just about frequency, Britney Spears would have topped our list. In fact, she landed more than 30 covers this year, but proved a bust with readers, ranking dead last in both our likability and cover sales categories.

People Managing Editor Larry Hackett says Spears is a case of editors going to the well too often without much new to say. "The way people are covered these days, even if you were Cleopatra, people would get tired of you," he says. "You just can't be covered 24/7 and remain that interesting."

Still, Spears no longer ranks last in our rankings -- a dubious title she earned last year. Instead, Hollywood's top-earning tween Miley Cyrus loses this time around, scoring poorly in all three categories. While there's no doubt she's powerful and popular, it seems the "Hannah Montana" star's appeal isn't broad enough for the celebrity weekly set.

"Here is a teenager who's quickly becoming a multi-millionaire, if not a billionaire," says Lee. "It's pretty hard to relate to that."

Reporting by Lacey Rose

comments

comments

comments 1-10 of 227  |< newest · < newer · older > · oldest >|  hide comments · post a comment
  • ♥punk rock ♥
    love Angelina Jolie she is a great actress
    report abuseposted October 27, 2008 9:54 PM PDT
  • Preci
    WHO DUZNT WANNA BUY A MAG WITH ANGIE ON IT, SHES HAWT!?!
    report abuseposted October 17, 2008 1:24 AM PDT
  • cherbear
    For those of you who feel that they must waste their hard earned money on the rag magazines, please recycle & put it where it really belongs. Line the bottom of your pet's cage or box with this ### & roll up their waste in it. Do this esp. with Jolie's stories. Got milk? HA!
    report abuseposted October 13, 2008 8:59 AM PDT
  • Alicein
    Angelina is sooooo HAWT!!!!!!! I once went to a premere of hers' and I was right next to the red carpet and I touched her titties!!!!!!
    report abuseposted October 12, 2008 5:54 PM PDT
  • Jeff Chang J.C.
    I actually have a entertainment weekly over of Ledger, they did an incredible job with the coverage of him, many people miss him and the coverage was great.
    report abuseposted October 12, 2008 4:45 AM PDT
  • Terry M
    How can we even judge these people and their lives? We don't even know them..all we know is what the media tells us and what the mag's edit in the interview..
    report abuseposted October 12, 2008 2:29 AM PDT
  • Lindsay H
    Angelina is so hot!She is my favorite actress.Her photos were seen at milllionaire persoanals site ******AffluentBachelors . c o m*****last week. It is said she is already in relationship with a young billionaire on that site now. ☆☆☆☆☆???☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆
    report abuseposted October 10, 2008 11:41 PM PDT
  • justme
    I respect AJ for all the work she has done in the world as a UN ambassador & such. So what if she's not married? So what if she adopted her children from other countries. Adoption is giving a child a chance for a better life. I truly believe she loves those kids and didnt adopt them to get yours or anyone elses approval. Don't say shes horrible and w/o morals because they a
    report abuseposted October 10, 2008 10:59 PM PDT
  • jules
    Yes, sure there are lot's of kids here in the US that need homes but really though when it comes down to it, kids that aren't adopted here in the US are still more privilege than 3rd world country kids. Besides that, many families that adopt kids in US can end up loosing their child when the parents decided that they are clean, sober, mature or whatever enough to be parents again t
    report abuseposted October 10, 2008 8:12 PM PDT
  • Gerbil
    I dont have a problem with Angelina adopting kids per se but it tends to be a trend in the celebrity culture to adopt kids from third world countries. Theres plenty of needy kids in their own town that could use a loving family. If it were for the kids then there would be a mix of nationalities. I think some Celebs see forign kids as the new Purse Dog, something to show off to flaunt their status
    report abuseposted October 10, 2008 7:59 PM PDT
comments 1-10 of 227  |< newest · < newer · older > · oldest >| 

Post A Comment

sign in to post a comment.

sign in

Help us to improve! - Send Your Suggestions