Peter Cook: There Is No Temporary Restraining Order Against Me

Us Magazine - October 9, 2008 1:46 PM PDT
Story photo: Peter Cook: There Is No Temporary Restraining Order Against MeUs Magazine
Peter Cook has confirmed a judge rejected a restraining order filed by ex Christie Brinkley to prevent him from seeing their two children as part of scheduled visitation this weekend.

"There was no temporary restraining order issued against [me]," Cook told Usmagazine.com. "Ms. Brinkley sought to suspend my parenting time with our children for this weekend, and her motion was denied."

Brinkley feared her son, Jack, 13, and daughter Sailor, 10, could be negatively impacted after his highly-publicized 20/20 interview interview airs Friday.

(In the interview, he tells Barbara Walters, "I'm not the scumbag pervert that I've been painted to be.")

James Winkler, Cook's attorney, argues that his client, "had no intention of exposing the children to this interview and would be happy to take them away for the weekend if that would make Ms. Brinkley more comfortable - so that's what he's doing."

(Added Winkler: "The judge did point out, from the stand, that it was Ms. Brinkley who sought the open courtroom in the first place during the trial. My client has never had an interest in exposing the children to any of this stuff.")

Brinkley's lawyer, Robert Stephan Cohen told Us that the "court order mandates" Cook take the children, "away from his home, and he can't expose them to the 20/20 broadcast.

"Christie Brinkleys sole concern is to protect her children," added Cohen.

Cook and Brinkley finalized their divorce this past week, four months after a bitter public divorce battle. Brinkley received sole custody of the kids.

See Hollywood's ugliest divorces.

The couple split two years ago after Cook has an affair with his 18-year-old assistant, Diana Bianchi.

More news from Usmagazine.com

comments

comments

comments 1-10 of 12  |< newest · < newer · older > · oldest >|  hide comments · post a comment
  • lesley k
    You know cheating is wrong. He should of told her that it was time to end this marriage and never cheated with a under aged girl. There are many men who look at porn even when they are happy in there marriage. Thats what men do. He deserve to have joint custody of his children they obviously love him and this has nothing to do with them.
    report abuseposted October 13, 2008 8:24 AM PDT
  • bitchydeena
    he's certainly not as funny as the Peter Cook that used to work with Dudley Moore a lot. the original Bedazzled movie was extremely amusing.
    report abuseposted October 10, 2008 12:56 AM PDT
  • Gabe
    I would have had more respect for Mr. Cook if he just divorced his wife with dignity than to cheat and act like the victim. Christie has class. Remember Mr. Cook, the second you cheated on your wife, you also cheated on those children of yours.
    report abuseposted October 9, 2008 6:39 PM PDT
  • Pamela G
    i completely disagree with anyone who criticizes or blames christie 4 cook's cheating. there is no excuse 4 what he did, and now he's playing the victim?? puh-leeeze!! how can u blame her 4 trying to protect her kids from all his LIES??
    report abuseposted October 9, 2008 5:36 PM PDT
  • Pamela G
    i completely disagree with anyone who criticizes or blames christie 4 cook's cheating. there is no excuse 4 what he did, and now he's playing the victim?? puh-leeeze!! how can u blame her 4 trying to protect her kids from all his LIES??
    report abuseposted October 9, 2008 5:36 PM PDT
  • dizzyupthegirl66
    LEAVE CHRISTY ALONE,HE IS A SCUMBUCKET PERVERT!!!
    report abuseposted October 9, 2008 3:49 PM PDT
  • Maria T
    She really needs to get over it and get on with her life already!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    report abuseposted October 9, 2008 2:32 PM PDT
  • Lisa B
    wow, shes psycho
    report abuseposted October 9, 2008 1:33 PM PDT
  • dani g
    HELLO???????????? PAY HER ALL OF WHAT MONEY???? HE HAD NO MONEY in comparision to Christie's money when they were married. SHE'S THE CASH COW THERE AND HAD TO HAND HIM 2MILLION DOLLARS TO GET LOST-HE'S A LOW-LIFE AND HE KNOWS IT. IF HE WASN'T HE WOULD HAVE A LEAST TOLD HER IT WAS OVER AND DATED A WOMAN CLOSER TO HIS OWN AGE!!!!!!!!!
    report abuseposted October 9, 2008 1:29 PM PDT
  • Kris B
    Um, based on how public their divorce was, why is she freaking out about them being able to see his 20/20 interview? What is she so afraid of?
    report abuseposted October 9, 2008 1:21 PM PDT
comments 1-10 of 12  |< newest · < newer · older > · oldest >| 

Post A Comment

sign in to post a comment.

sign in

Help us to improve! - Send Your Suggestions