Octuplet Mother Fires Free Nurses: "It Was Really Bad"

Us Magazine - March 24, 2009 5:31 PM PDT
Story photo: Octuplet Mother Fires Free Nurses: Nadya Suleman seen going to the hospital to pick up two babies in Hollywood on March 16, 2009.Us Magazine
Octo Mom Nadya Suleman has confirmed to Usmagazine.com she has fired the free nursing staff provided to her by the non-profit charity organization Angels In Waiting.

Meet the octuplet babies!

"Yes, it's true. I released AIW," Suleman said in a statement to Us. "It was really bad. That's all I can say. I can't confirm, why, in particular. I will be releasing the details soon."

See how Octo Mom spends her days.

Her spokesman accused the non-profit charity group -- which announced their plans to assist Suleman in raising her 14 children during a March 14 taping of Dr. Phil -- of spying on her and reporting her to child welfare officials.

Suleman had several confrontations with the nurses, her attorney Jeff Czech said. Relations worsened Sunday when Suleman came to believe that Angels in Waiting founder Linda West-Conforti was allegedly filing a report against her with child welfare officials.

Said Czech, Nadya felt that she was being judged wrongfully, and she didn't need it."

See Octo Mom's family album.

Suleman -- who has custody of four infants so far -- says she'll rely on her own nannies -- whom she had planned to hire regardless of Angels in Waiting's assistance -- to care for the babies instead.

Attorney Gloria Allred who represents Angels in Waiting, told Usmagazine.com via e-mail Monday: "We have no comment at this time. We will respond tomorrow afternoon with the true facts."

According to RadarOnline.com, which first broke the story, members of Angels in Waiting are scheduled to tape an episode of Dr. Phil Tuesday. Suleman also hopes to appear on the show to defend herself.

Follow Us Weekly on Twitter!

Suleman turned down an earlier offer from Angels in Waiting because they wouldn't let her film a reality show, Allred said.




More news from Usmagazine.com

comments

comments

comments 1-10 of 410  |< newest · < newer · older > · oldest >|  hide comments · post a comment
  • What you people don’t realize is that once the state gets involved (meaning child and protective services ) there next move, will be to court order Octomom to comply with state Services while they’re pending an investigation !These services can be received voluntary or by court order form the state (of course with judges rubber stamp) Now that someone has called in (the investigation
    report abuseposted March 27, 2009 7:08 PM PDT
  • 4Justice2
    NADYA SULEMAN IN MENTALLY UNSTABLE!!!! PERIOD!!!!!!!!! IF DEPENDS ON ME, SHE WILL NEVER SEE ONE PENNY!!! WHY SHOULD ANYONE BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CHILDREN THAT SHE IRRESPONSIBLY PUT IN THE WORLD??? THE HELL WITH THIS IDIOT! HER CHILDREN ARE HER OWN CREATED PROBLEM!
    report abuseposted March 27, 2009 1:04 PM PDT
  • 4Justice2
    NADYA SULEMAN IN MENTALLY UNSTABLE!!!! PERIOD!!!!!!!!! IF DEPENDS ON ME, SHE WILL NEVER SEE ONE PENNY!!! WHY SHOULD ANYONE BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CHILDREN THAT SHE IRRESPONSIBLY PUT IN THE WORLD??? THE HELL WITH THIS IDIOT! HER CHILDREN ARE HER OWN CREATED PROBLEM!
    report abuseposted March 27, 2009 1:03 PM PDT
  • 4Justice2
    NADYA SULEMAN IN MENTALLY UNSTABLE!!!! PERIOD!!!!!!!!! IF DEPENDS ON ME, SHE WILL NEVER SEE ONE PENNY!!! WHY SHOULD ANYONE BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CHILDREN THAT SHE IRRESPONSIBLY PUT IN THE WORLD??? THE HELL WITH THIS IDIOT! HER CHILDREN ARE HER OWN CREATED PROBLEM!
    report abuseposted March 27, 2009 1:02 PM PDT
  • 4Justice2
    NADYA SULEMAN IN MENTALLY UNSTABLE!!!! PERIOD!!!!!!!!! IF DEPENDS ON ME, SHE WILL NEVER SEE ONE PENNY!!! WHY SHOULD ANYONE BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CHILDREN THAT SHE IRRESPONSIBLY PUT IN THE WORLD??? THE HELL WITH THIS IDIOT! HER CHILDREN ARE HER OWN CREATED PROBLEM!
    report abuseposted March 27, 2009 1:02 PM PDT
  • 4Justice2
    NADYA SULEMAN IN MENTALLY UNSTABLE!!!! PERIOD!!!!!!!!! IF DEPENDS ON ME, SHE WILL NEVER SEE ONE PENNY!!! WHY SHOULD ANYONE BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CHILDREN THAT SHE IRRESPONSIBLY PUT IN THE WORLD??? THE HELL WITH THIS IDIOT! HER CHILDREN ARE HER OWN CREATED PROBLEM!
    report abuseposted March 27, 2009 1:01 PM PDT
  • 4Justice2
    NADYA SULEMAN IN MENTALLY UNSTABLE!!!! PERIOD!!!!!!!!! IF DEPENDS ON ME, SHE WILL NEVER SEE ONE PENNY!!! WHY SHOULD ANYONE BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CHILDREN THAT SHE IRRESPONSIBLY PUT IN THE WORLD??? THE HELL WITH THIS IDIOT! HER CHILDREN ARE HER OWN CREATED PROBLEM!
    report abuseposted March 27, 2009 1:01 PM PDT
  • 4Justice2
    NADYA SULEMAN IN MENTALLY UNSTABLE!!!! PERIOD!!!!!!!!! IF DEPENDS ON ME, SHE WILL NEVER SEE ONE PENNY!!! WHY SHOULD ANYONE BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CHILDREN THAT SHE IRRESPONSIBLY PUT IN THE WORLD??? THE HELL WITH THIS IDIOT! HER CHILDREN ARE HER OWN CREATED PROBLEM!
    report abuseposted March 27, 2009 1:00 PM PDT
  • 4Justice2
    NADYA SULEMAN IN MENTALLY UNSTABLE!!!! PERIOD!!!!!!!!! IF DEPENDS ON ME, SHE WILL NEVER SEE ONE PENNY!!! WHY SHOULD ANYONE BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CHILDREN THAT SHE IRRESPONSIBLY PUT IN THE WORLD??? THE HELL WITH THIS IDIOT! HER CHILDREN ARE HER OWN CREATED PROBLEM!
    report abuseposted March 27, 2009 12:59 PM PDT
  • LynnStarr
    i feel she deserves some privacy. if tv is involved it should be her choice, and for her reasons.
    report abuseposted March 27, 2009 4:29 AM PDT
comments 1-10 of 410  |< newest · < newer · older > · oldest >| 

Post A Comment

sign in to post a comment.

sign in

Help us to improve! - Send Your Suggestions