Katherine Jackson's Attorney: Custody Agreement For Jackson's Children 'Close'

• send
  send

  • email
  • im
• share
  share

  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • facebook
• print

comments

comments

• Cassie
  I believe that Debbie is just in it for the money. she doesnt desearve those children. When she hasnt really been a major part of their lives. I mean come on the woman gave up custody of her children for money. What kind of mother would do that. I dont care if I was broke and on welfare. My kids stay with me end of story. There is no amount of money in the world that would buy my kids.

  report abuseposted July 29, 2009 2:00 AM PDT
• ozzie l
  Now that Michael Jackson has passed away, the truths of those diabolic accusations will one day be revealed while he rests in peace and Satan will die forever! Satan lives only until his lies are made known. Also, Satan refuses to repent.

  report abuseposted July 28, 2009 9:35 AM PDT
• Joy W
  Debbie was never there to be an actual mother; I think she likes her freedom. I honestly don't believe that she has ever wanted to be a full time mother. Michael would not have said his mother should take care of the children, if he thought his father would have anything to do with them. He knew that his dad doesn't live with his mom. The kids have stated they want Grandma, give th

  report abuseposted July 28, 2009 8:28 AM PDT
• Joy W
  I AM SO GLAD THEY DID THIS THE RIGHT WAY, ha ha ha Media, you didn't get what you wanted. You wanted this to get ugly and stuff, but you didn't get it. Good job to Debbie Rowe and Kathrine Jackson. I know that Michael is proud of you both for doing this the right way.

  report abuseposted July 28, 2009 8:26 AM PDT
• Natasha
  I feel the children are better off with the Grandmother not only because it is Michael's wish, but this is life and family they have grow and devlope to be .I feel regaurdless if Debbie Rowe is there mother she knows the role she played. Michael had her concieve the children her role is over and DR is paid in full..To rip the children from there grandmother is wrong.

  report abuseposted July 28, 2009 5:40 AM PDT
• Renisa
  i agree with t lovely. if mj had a troubled life at home. why put those kids through the same thing. i believe debbie is whats best for the kids. their mother... and let the jacksons live their life doing what they all do best.being crazy...you all need jesus. and read some of gods word. really....

  report abuseposted July 27, 2009 9:17 PM PDT
• Lizzie
  Debbie Rowe wont those kids for the money, not love, to much times has past for those kids. She was paid one time. If she love those kids, she wouldn't accepted the money the first time. The kids need to stay with the family they love. Not Rowe because they doesn't no her.

  report abuseposted July 27, 2009 9:14 PM PDT
• xoxo
  No one knows the real story about MJ and we probably never will. He was obviously a sensitive soul - a lot of highly creative types are. Yet he also had the means to get psychiatric help for his problems. We all have demons to overcome in life and it's just so unfortunate that he didn't get the right kind of help to overcome his. Maybe in your next life MJ!

  report abuseposted July 27, 2009 8:58 PM PDT
• Lizzie
  Debbie Rowe, it's a money thing. To much times has past in those kids life,you wasn't there, No love there.

  report abuseposted July 27, 2009 8:56 PM PDT
• REI M
  If I got a divorce and thought that my children were better off with their father, and then he died...I would not let their 'grandmother' take over. I think she agreed that JACKSON was good for them but I'm not sure about ANY of his family. Sure they can be a part of their lives but I still think they should be with their mother. It's pretty safe to say Wako Jacko

  report abuseposted July 27, 2009 8:21 PM PDT