Judge Denies Christie Brinkley's Request For Restraining Order Against Ex-Husband

• send
  send

  • email
  • im
• share
  share

  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • facebook
• print

comments

comments

• Amy F
  If the order demands silence on court proceedings, then he is in contempt of the court. That's ridiculous to allow him to speak on national television about this. The quicker they grow up, the more time their kids will have as kids.

  report abuseposted October 12, 2008 4:03 PM PDT
• amour
  When the kids are grown up they will hear about all of the mess anyway, and will probably read about it in somebody's tell-all book. Christie, please...let it go! Think about the effect your attitude is going to have on your children. It's just not worth it.

  report abuseposted October 12, 2008 7:51 AM PDT
• bitchydeena
  she is so ridiculous.

  report abuseposted October 10, 2008 12:30 AM PDT
• richierich331968
  Poetic justice for Billy Joel I figure.

  report abuseposted October 9, 2008 10:42 PM PDT
• placekpr
  For heaven's sake, Christie, go find some other jacka$$ to marry you and shut the hell up! You ran your mouth enough in court to keep your kids in therapy for years, and now you don't want him to comment. Gee, I wonder why she can't keep a man.

  report abuseposted October 9, 2008 9:06 PM PDT
• placekpr
  For heaven's sake, Christie, go get some other jacka$$ to marry you and quite whining. You ran your mouth for days in court, giving your kids reason to be in therapy for years. Get by it already!

  report abuseposted October 9, 2008 8:46 PM PDT
• LaaaaDiDa
  Gawd - she needs to be like those dolts on the old Love Connection show.... where their judgement is clearly so bad that they let the audience pick. I wonder what Chuck Wollery is up to these days?? Maybe he should be her personal dating coach. Back in 2 and 2!

  report abuseposted October 9, 2008 6:46 PM PDT