Debbie Rowe Confirms She Will Seek Custody Of Children With Michael Jackson

Access Hollywood - July 2, 2009 6:31 PM PDT
Story photo: Debbie Rowe Confirms She Will Seek Custody Of Children With Michael JacksonMichael Jackson and Debbie Rowe greet fans from the balcony of the hotel Royal Monceau in Paris in 1997 Getty PremiumAccess Hollywood

LOS ANGELES, Calif. -- Debbie Rowe will fight for custody of her two children with Michael Jackson, according to KNBC Los Angeles reporter Chuck Henry, who spoke to the pop star's ex-wife on Thursday morning.

Henry, who said he had a "long conversation" with Rowe, confirmed the woman's plans to pursue custody of Prince Michael I, 12, and Paris Jackson, 11.

VIEW THE PHOTOS: Michael Jackson: The King Of Pop

"She told me, 'Yes I am stepping up... I have to.' She will try for custody of her children," Henry said. "And she was still very much grieving this morning and has been, she says, for the last week over the death of Michael Jackson."

Additionally, Rowe told Henry that she plans to take action to keep Joe Jackson away from his grandchildren.

VIEW THE PHOTOS: Michael Jackson: The Life Of An Icon

"She also said she would seek some kind of restraining order if that was necessary to keep Joe Jackson, Michael Jackson's father, away from the children," Henry recounted.

According to the Los Angeles Times, eight years ago, Rowe told a Los Angeles court she had the children for the pop star, not for herself.

"I had the children for him. They wouldn't be on this planet if it wasn't for my love for him," she reportedly said in court. "I did it for him to become a father, not for me to become a mother. You earn the title 'parent.' I have done absolutely nothing to earn that title."

VIEW THE PHOTOS: Michael Jackson & His Superstar Friends

And when asked by Henry why the woman planned to step forward now after previously choosing to give custody to the pop star, Rowe reportedly told Henry, "'We had an agreement. He didn't keep his end.'"

The pop star didn't keep his end of the bargain by dying, Henry explained of Rowe's comments.

"[It] was always her assumption that he would outlive them and when he died... That's when she decided she had to do something. She told me, 'They are my flesh and blood. I'm going after my children,'" Henry recounted.

Henry said Rowe had an agreement with her ex-husband that "did allow for visitation," but Henry said Rowe told him it was "very difficult for her to do."

Rowe told Henry if she missed a visitation date due to illness or similar reason, "it would be hard to get a makeup date, so it was very difficult to visit the children," he recounted.

Rowe also told the reporter she would be willing to take care of Jackson's third child so as not to split up the youngsters.

"She was very much concerned about [not splitting up the kids]," Henry added. "I pointedly asked her about that and she said she would take the child we know as Blanket, Prince Michael II, but she didn't have any illusions that the court would award her the third child. But she said she would."

Currently, Katherine Jackson, Michael's mother, has temporary guardianship of the pop star's children. She was also named in the star's will as the person he wanted to have custody.

But according to the LA Times, when reports came up years ago that Katherine Jackson might adopt the children, Rowe was quoted as saying she would "never consent to such a thing. She said she was "certain" that the pop star's parents "would not properly care for the children."

In 1999, Rowe gave Michael Jackson sole custody of their two children. Following their divorce, she received an $8.5 million settlement, the LA Times reported. Two years later, she filed a petition to give up her parental rights and admitted to not seeing the children. However she said in court, "I am absolutely around if Michael ever needs me, if the children need me for a liver, a kidney, a hello, whatever," the paper reported.

When asked what would happen to the children in the event of the pop star's death, Rowe reportedly said she would not want the children back.

"I am sure he has a wonderful person in mind to take care of them," she said at the time, according to the paper.

Later, however, Rowe contested waiving her parent rights. While Michael Jackson's lawyers claimed she was after money, she cited the molestation charges against the singer and his connection to the Nation of Islam.

"Because she is Jewish, Deborah feared the children might be mistreated if Michael continued his association," the court said, according to the Times.

As previously reported on AccessHollywood.com, the pop star left Rowe out of his will. Jackson left all assets to the Michael Jackson Family Trust. According to documents submitted with the will, Rowe was not a member of the Michael Jackson Family Trust.

Related Content from AccessHollywood.com:
PLAY IT NOW: Michael Jackson's Will Revealed (July 1, 2009)
PLAY IT NOW: Access Extended: Dr. Bruce Hensel Weighs In On Michael Jackson's Death

MORE ACCESS ON THESE TOPICS: Debbie Rowe - Michael Jackson - TV One - Joe Jackson - NBC

comments

comments

comments 1-10 of 101  |< newest · < newer · older > · oldest >|  hide comments · post a comment
  • Elove
    I dont feel that debbie should even be able to seek custody because 1. SHE WAS NEVER AROUND 2. ALL SHE IS SEEING NOW IS $$$$$$$$$!!3. THOSE KIDS DONT KNOW HER (BEWARE OF STRANGER DANGER!!!!!!!) i SAW HIM AND THE KIDS ON A LONG LOST HOME VIDEO AND DEBBIE WAS NEVER IN THOSE VIDEOS!! SHE NEEDS TO KEEP DOING WHAT SHE HAS ALWAYS DID N-O-T-H-I-N-G!!!! SHE GAVE UP CUSTODY OF HER OWN KIDS!!
    report abuseposted July 6, 2009 12:58 AM PDT
  • Rhue
    It doesn't seem like she cares for their true well being.I feel she will sell the children to the media with interveiws, pictures, and all that jazz. there is a reason Michael didn't leave custody to her!!!!!!
    report abuseposted July 5, 2009 8:37 PM PDT
  • Rhue
    It doesn't seem like she cares for their true well being.I feel she will sell the children to the media with interveiws, pictures, and all that jazz. there is a reason Michael didn't leave custody to her!!!!!!
    report abuseposted July 5, 2009 8:37 PM PDT
  • don diva
    Micheal Jackson's wishes were for his children to live with his mother. Debbie Rowe should not seek custody of the children because she was not apart of their lives when Micheal was alive. Does she really want to be a mother to the children now or does she see dollar signs? Maybe the children should have a say over who they want to live with. They are old enough to do so. Keep them t
    report abuseposted July 5, 2009 4:04 AM PDT
  • VenL
    And the sadness continues.....
    report abuseposted July 4, 2009 9:59 PM PDT
  • __A_YAHOO_USER__
    common sense his tribe of a family should not the mother shouldnt the judge should go with diana ross......simple the other no way if i was judge it wouldnt be happening ,,,but MONEY IS DOING THE TALKING.....his parents were never fit neither is the real mother she never wanted them and sold them to michael and gave up her rights they dont even know her and they shouldnt get a chance
    report abuseposted July 4, 2009 1:23 AM PDT
  • Naomi
    Children need love first. I believe Micheal 's mother is a good choice Ms. Rowe should just have visiting rights.
    report abuseposted July 3, 2009 11:49 PM PDT
  • itgirl
    Michael Jackson was their mom and Debbie "show me the money" Rowe should find another way to pay off the double wide.
    report abuseposted July 3, 2009 10:08 PM PDT
  • jazzy g
    well as long as she wants Blanket too that's my main concern that if he was left behind without his brother and sister...and to leave them under Joe's thumb wouldn't be cool, and his mother didn't helpout too much when her own kids where growing up with him let them go back to their Mother even if she is just the bio...
    report abuseposted July 3, 2009 6:34 PM PDT
  • Sonita A
    MONEY SPEAKS VERY LOUD HERE, IT BRING OUT THE WOLVES, I MEAN ROWE, IF A JUDGE GIVE THIS WOMEN THESES KIDS, THEY SHOULD BURN IN HELL FOR ALL ETERNITY, WAKE UP PEOPLE THIS WOMEN SOLD HERE KIDS LIKE CATTLE, NOW YOU THINK SHE SHOULD TAKE CUSTODY, PUT THESE KIDS IN FOSTER CARE FIRST, I DON'T CARE IF SHE'S THE MOTHER, SHE SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO GET NEAR THESES KIDS. I THINK THE KIDS SHOUL
    report abuseposted July 3, 2009 12:45 PM PDT
comments 1-10 of 101  |< newest · < newer · older > · oldest >| 

Post A Comment

sign in to post a comment.

sign in

Help us to improve! - Send Your Suggestions