Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Academy makes credits exception for 'Tree of Life'

    LOS ANGELES, Jan 27 (TheWrap.com) - The Academy has made an unusual exception for "The Tree of Life," determining that the film has four true producers and should not be limited by an AMPAS rule that limits the number of producers on a Best Picture nominee to three.

    Sarah Green, Bill Pohlad, Dede Gardner and Grant Hill all "functioned as genuine producers" on the Terrence Malick film, according to a ruling from the Academy's Producers Branch Executive Committee. Under Academy rules that went into effect after five producers won Oscar statuettes for "Shakespeare in Love" in 1999, more than three producers can be credited only in the case of a "rare and extraordinary circumstance."

    Typically, the Academy allows the Producers Guild of America to determine which producers truly deserve credit. "The Tree of Life" did not receive a PGA nomination.

    Of the other eight Best Picture nominees, "The Descendants," "The Help" and "Moneyball" have three credited producers; "Hugo," "Midnight in Paris" and "War Horse" have two; and "The Artist" and "Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close" have one.

    Last year, the Academy made an exception for "The Social Network," which earned Oscar nominations for four of its producers. The previous year they did the same for Best Picture winner "The Hurt Locker."

    The producer who most likely would have been eliminated if AMPAS had enforced the three-producer limit in that case was Nicolas Chartier, who was later banned from the Oscar show for emails disparaging "Avatar."

    (Editing By Zorianna Kit)

     

    5 comments

    • Greed is good  •  27 days ago
      Evidently they didn't do enough. That was one of the all time worst movies ever made, unless, of course, you are a fan of sitting around, hours on end, watching a lava lamp. I stayed longer than I should have. The picture opened with about 60 people in the audience and there were less than 10 when I finally gave up. How could this possibly be nominated for any type of award? Oh wait, Titanic won best picture several years ago and it was so horrid it was impossible to watch, I left after the first hour or so. What puzzeled me about the movie was why, when they would shift back to the old woman who was telling the story, those listening were not all asleep. That would have given the picture some small touch of reality.
    • gdavisloop  •  Los Angeles, California  •  28 days ago
      This is so interesting... NOT! Maybe if you explained something about what four producers do...
    • rbbrittain  •  28 days ago
      The article didn't mention the one out of the original 5 who was ditched: Brad Pitt. But don't feel sorry for him; he was one of the three producers who received Moneyball's Best Picture nom, in addition to his own Best Actor nom.
    • Esa  •  28 days ago
      The worst film I've ever seen.
    • Joseph  •  29 days ago
      Reading the credits is sometimes the most interesting thing about this beautifully photographed bore. Too many cooks???? I think not. Just one...a Mr. Malik.